On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:09 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 02:16 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide
> > the PWM API without using the generic framework. However, legacy
> > PWM drivers were already moved to the generic PWM framework.
> > Thus, HAVE_PWM should be removed, because HAVE_PWM is not
> > required anymore.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <[email protected]>
> 
> Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]>

Hi Lars-Peter Clausen,

I really appreciate your Acked-by. However, the same patch was
already submitted by Sascha Hauer.[1] So, please ignore this patch.
Thank you.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/16/262

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
> > ---
> >   drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > index ae74df7..762e6d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ config INPUT_PCF8574
> >
> >   config INPUT_PWM_BEEPER
> >     tristate "PWM beeper support"
> > -   depends on PWM && HAVE_PWM
> > +   depends on PWM
> >     help
> >       Say Y here to get support for PWM based beeper devices.
> >
> >

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to