From: Mark Brown <[email protected]>

While searching for users of spi_async() I found a reference in the ad7877
driver to using it to initiate data transfer from the interrupt handler.
However there is no code for this, instead the interrupt handler is a
threaded handler and uses spi_sync() instead.

Remove the bitrotted comment, though in actual fact the use case mentioned
is a great use for spi_async() since it would cut down on latency handling
the interrupt by saving us a context switch before we start SPI.

This was previously implemented, it was removed in commit b534422b2d11
(Input: ad7877 - switch to using threaded IRQ) for code complexity reasons.
It may be better to revert that commit instead.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7877.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7877.c 
b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7877.c
index 6793c85903ae..523865daa1d3 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7877.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7877.c
@@ -210,11 +210,6 @@ static bool gpio3;
 module_param(gpio3, bool, 0);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(gpio3, "If gpio3 is set to 1 AUX3 acts as GPIO3");
 
-/*
- * ad7877_read/write are only used for initial setup and for sysfs controls.
- * The main traffic is done using spi_async() in the interrupt handler.
- */
-
 static int ad7877_read(struct spi_device *spi, u16 reg)
 {
        struct ser_req *req;
-- 
1.9.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to