Hi,
On 11/11/2014 05:55 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> On 10/25/2014 02:01 PM, Mathias Gottschlag wrote:
>>> +static void focaltech_report_state(struct psmouse *psmouse)
>>> +{
>>> + int i;
>>> + struct focaltech_data *priv = psmouse->private;
>>> + struct focaltech_hw_state *state = &priv->state;
>>> + struct input_dev *dev = psmouse->dev;
>>> + int finger_count = 0;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < FOC_MAX_FINGERS; i++) {
>>> + struct focaltech_finger_state *finger = &state->fingers[i];
>>> + int active = finger->active && finger->valid;
>>> + input_mt_slot(dev, i);
>>> + input_mt_report_slot_state(dev, MT_TOOL_FINGER, active);
>>> + if (active) {
>>> + finger_count++;
>>> + input_report_abs(dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, finger->x);
>>> + input_report_abs(dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
>>> + focaltech_invert_y(finger->y));
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, false);
>>> + input_mt_report_finger_count(dev, finger_count);
>>
>> These 2 lines should be replace with:
>> input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, finger_count);
>>
>> So that BTN_TOUCH properly gets set when at least one finger is down (this is
>> mandatory when not reporting pressure).
>
> I am baffled by this suggestion. input_mt_report_pointer_emulation()
> always report BTN_TOUCH, regardless of the value of the 2nd argument.
My bad, I misread the code (I think I mixed up the use_count and count vars).
> Also, the name of the 2nd argument is "use_count" and it is boolean, so
> I am not sure why you are suggesting that we basically do:
>
> if (finger_count)
> input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, true /*count them again
> */);
> else
> input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dve, false);
>
> Did you mean to tell Mathias to call
> input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, *true*); to instruct MT core to
> count contacts and emit appropriate BTN_TOOL_* based on number of
> contacts (if any)?
Right, rereading things, their is no need for the focaltech code to do
its own finger counting, and these 2 calls:
input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, false);
input_mt_report_finger_count(dev, finger_count);
Should be replaced with:
input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(dev, true);
Sorry for the confusion.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
