On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 08:34 +0200, Asaf Vertz wrote:
> Fixed a coding style error, macros with complex values should be
> enclosed in parentheses.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c 
> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/edt-ft5x06.c
[]
> @@ -849,10 +849,11 @@ static int edt_ft5x06_ts_identify(struct i2c_client 
> *client,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) \
> +#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg) { \
>       if (pdata->name >= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_low &&          \
>           pdata->name <= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_high)           \
> -             edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name)
> +             edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name);    \
> +}

Any time you see a naked if (foo) bar in a macro
prefer to use a do while (0) like;

#define EDT_ATTR_CHECKSET(name, reg)                                    \
do {                                                                    \
        if (pdata->name >= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_low &&          \
            pdata->name <= edt_ft5x06_attr_##name.limit_high)           \
                edt_ft5x06_register_write(tsdata, reg, pdata->name);    \
while (0)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to