Hi
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, David Herrmann wrote:
>
>> On an PC-101/103/104 keyboard (American layout) the 'Enter' key and its
>> neighbours look like this:
>>
>> +---+ +---+ +-------+
>> | 1 | | 2 | | 5 |
>> +---+ +---+ +-------+
>> +---+ +-----------+
>> | 3 | | 4 |
>> +---+ +-----------+
>
> [ ... snip ... ]
>
> Alright, I can't really see this introducing any regressions. I have now
> queued this for 3.20.
As Fredrik wrote, we need to also check for VARIABLE:
if (!(field->flags & (HID_MAIN_ITEM_RELATIVE |
HID_MAIN_ITEM_BUFFERED_BYTE)) &&
(field->flags & HID_MAIN_ITEM_VARIABLE) &&
usage->usage_index < field->maxusage &&
value == field->value[usage->usage_index]) {
the added line is:
(field->flags & HID_MAIN_ITEM_VARIABLE) &&
I'll not be at home until tomorrow. Feel free to add it yourself,
otherwise, basic HID keyboards that use ARRAY reports are broken.
Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
