On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:21:36PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 04:10:16PM +0800, Sam hung wrote:
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > index f2b9780..4891d07 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> > @@ -700,14 +700,14 @@ static int elantech_packet_check_v1(struct psmouse 
> > *psmouse)
> >  
> >  static int elantech_debounce_check_v2(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> >  {
> > -        /*
> > -         * When we encounter packet that matches this exactly, it means the
> > -         * hardware is in debounce status. Just ignore the whole packet.
> > -         */
> > -        const u8 debounce_packet[] = { 0x84, 0xff, 0xff, 0x02, 0xff, 0xff 
> > };
> > -        unsigned char *packet = psmouse->packet;
> > -
> > -        return !memcmp(packet, debounce_packet, sizeof(debounce_packet));
> > +   /*
> > +   * When we encounter packet that matches this exactly, it means the
> > +   * hardware is in debounce status. Just ignore the whole packet.
> > +   */
> > +   const u8 debounce_packet[] = { 0x84, 0xff, 0xff, 0x02, 0xff, 0xff };
> > +   unsigned char *packet = psmouse->packet;
> > +
> > +   return !memcmp(packet, debounce_packet, sizeof(debounce_packet));
> >  }
> 
> Hmm, this chunk seems to be replacing spaces with tabs... I'd rather had
> it separate from the hardware version changes.
> 
> I'll pick up the chunk below though.

Ah, I missed the fact that the patch does not have your "signed-off-by"
signature (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches). Please resend with it.

> 
> >  
> >  static int elantech_packet_check_v2(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> > @@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id 
> > no_hw_res_dmi_table[] = {
> >  /*
> >   * determine hardware version and set some properties according to it.
> >   */
> > -static int elantech_set_properties(struct elantech_data *etd)
> > +static int elantech_set_properties(struct psmouse *psmouse, struct 
> > elantech_data *etd)
> >  {
> >     /* This represents the version of IC body. */
> >     int ver = (etd->fw_version & 0x0f0000) >> 16;
> > @@ -1520,9 +1520,12 @@ static int elantech_set_properties(struct 
> > elantech_data *etd)
> >             case 7:
> >             case 8:
> >             case 9:
> > +           case 10:
> > +           case 13:
> >                     etd->hw_version = 4;
> >                     break;
> >             default:
> > +                   psmouse_err(psmouse, "failed to setting hw version.\n");

The caller of elantech_set_properties() already issues message about
unknown hardware version, why do we need to have it here as well?

> >                     return -1;
> >             }
> >     }
> > @@ -1593,7 +1596,7 @@ int elantech_init(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> >     }
> >     etd->fw_version = (param[0] << 16) | (param[1] << 8) | param[2];
> >  
> > -   if (elantech_set_properties(etd)) {
> > +   if (elantech_set_properties(psmouse, etd)) {
> >             psmouse_err(psmouse, "unknown hardware version, aborting...\n");
> >             goto init_fail;
> >     }
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.2
> > 

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to