On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:25:32PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:34:04PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > if (np) {
> > > > - ts->reset_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "reset-gpios",
> > > > 0);
> > > > - if (ts->reset_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > > - return ts->reset_gpio;
> > > > - if (ts->reset_gpio < 0) {
> > > > + ts->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&spi->dev, "reset",
> > > > + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > >
> > > I think we should treat the gpio as optional and try to get the
> > > descriptor event on non-OF boards.
> >
> > As I wrote in the cover letter, I suggest to change this once the
> > Nokia N900 board code has been removed. At that point changing the
> > board code API is much easier, since it won't affect multiple trees.
>
> I do not see why it has be wait for Nokia board code. Just make it
> devm_gpiod_get_optional() and call it unconditionally and fall back onto
> custom reset function (if one is supplied).Right. I guess the same could be done for vio regulator. I will add this change in the next version of the patchset. -- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
