On Wed May 29, 2024 at 10:47 AM EEST, Jan Beulich wrote: > Has this possibly fallen through the cracks?
Not possibly that is what exactly has happened, sorry. I tweaked a bit the commit message: commit 2c0943eba0bd765e1e4a90234e669a26a9304b74 (HEAD -> master) Author: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> Date: Wed May 29 15:23:25 2024 +0300 tpm_tis: Do *not* flush uninitialized work tpm_tis_core_init() may fail before tpm_tis_probe_irq_single() is called, in which case tpm_tis_remove() unconditionally calling flush_work() is triggering a warning for .func still being NULL. Cc: [email protected] # v6.5+ Fixes: 481c2d14627d ("tpm,tpm_tis: Disable interrupts after 1000 unhandled IRQs") Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> Does this make sense to you? > Jan BR, Jarkko
