On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 5:18 PM Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-09-02 at 14:54 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > From: Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com> > > Remove above ... > > > > > This patch converts IMA and EVM to use the LSM frameworks's initcall > > mechanism. It moved the integrity_fs_init() call to ima_fs_init() and > > evm_init_secfs(), to work around the fact that there is no "integrity" LSM, > > and introduced integrity_fs_fini() to remove the integrity directory, if > > empty. Both integrity_fs_init() and integrity_fs_fini() support the > > scenario of being called by both the IMA and EVM LSMs. > > > > It is worth mentioning that this patch does not touch any of the > > "platform certs" code that lives in the security/integrity/platform_certs > > directory as the IMA/EVM maintainers have assured me that this code is > > unrelated to IMA/EVM, despite the location, and will be moved to a more > > This wording "unrelated to IMA/EVM" was taken from Paul's patch description, > but > needs to be tweaked. Please refer to my comment on Paul's patch.
Minim, Roberto, would both of you be okay if I changed the second paragraph to read as follows: "This patch does not touch any of the platform certificate code that lives under the security/integrity/platform_certs directory as the IMA/EVM developers would prefer to address that in a future patchset." > > relevant subsystem in the future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sa...@huawei.com> > > Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.ibm.com>, but not yet tested. -- paul-moore.com
