Dear Gunnar,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 15.09.25 um 20:20 schrieb Gunnar Kudrjavets:
The tpm_tis_write8() call specifies arguments in wrong order. Should be
(data, addr, value) not (data, value, addr). The initial correct order
was changed during the major refactoring when the code was split.
Fixes: 41a5e1cf1fe1 ("tpm/tpm_tis: Split tpm_tis driver into a core and TCG TIS
compliant phy")
$ git describe 41a5e1cf1fe1
v4.7-rc2-83-g41a5e1cf1fe1
Interesting, that this did not cause more havoc.
Signed-off-by: Gunnar Kudrjavets <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Justinien Bouron <[email protected]>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index 4b12c4b9da8b..8954a8660ffc 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_probe_irq_single(struct tpm_chip *chip,
u32 intmask,
* will call disable_irq which undoes all of the above.
*/
if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ)) {
- tpm_tis_write8(priv, original_int_vec,
- TPM_INT_VECTOR(priv->locality));
+ tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_INT_VECTOR(priv->locality),
+ original_int_vec);
rc = -1;
}
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
Kind regards,
Paul
