On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 05:28:00PM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
> used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
> schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
> again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
> This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
> 
> alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound
> workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND.
> 
> This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
> allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
> reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.
> 
> This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
> the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
> 
> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
> 
> This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request
> alloc_workqueue() to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified.
> 
> With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
> any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
> must now use WQ_PERCPU.
> 
> Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
> become the implicit default.
> 
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c 
> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
> index f2a5e09257dd..f942c0c8e402 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ void tpm_common_release(struct file *file, struct 
> file_priv *priv)
>  
>  int __init tpm_dev_common_init(void)
>  {
> -     tpm_dev_wq = alloc_workqueue("tpm_dev_wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> +     tpm_dev_wq = alloc_workqueue("tpm_dev_wq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_PERCPU,
> +                                  0);
>  
>       return !tpm_dev_wq ? -ENOMEM : 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.51.1
> 

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>

BR, Jarkko

Reply via email to