Hi!
> > n2cd now works for me (i.e. I've now two laptops connected using
> > infrared ports but without using irda stack. And one of them is
> > toshiba with toshoboe driver.)
> >
> > Unfortunately, I'm currently stuck at 9600. Irda defined its own
> > structure irda_device, and function for changing speed is in that
> > special structure, not in struct netdevice.
>
> Not IrDA, it was Thomas, Haris and myself!
When I written Irda, I meant "linux irda team", which means those
three. :-).
> > Proposal: move change_speed into struct netdevice, under do_ioctl
> > part. ifr_bandwidth just fits for our purposes.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I have planned to make the change speed ioctl for a long time since I need
> it for irdadump. Ifr_bandwidth looks fine, but there is no need for moving
> change_speed into struct netdevice. The device drivers ioctl function
> should be able to know the name if its own change_speed function.
Yes, that's exactly how I would like that. BTW things like name etc
could be implemented by ioctl, also, and then there would be no need
for irda_device any more :-).
Pavel
--
I'm really [EMAIL PROTECTED] Look at http://195.113.31.123/~pavel. Pavel
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
