Jean Tourrilhes schrieb:
...
> However, something that I would like is that every piece of
> information be tagged with the version of Linux-IrDA used. You see,
> there is lot's of information on the different version which are
> conflicting. In fact, it mostly hurt in chapter 6, if most piece of
> info had with it the version used, you would be able to grab the
I agree, this could be a solution, but actually I don't have time
to do this. So at least I try to follow the 'bleeding edge'.
And should make this more clear in the HOWTO I guess.
Another reason to do so is my intention to write
the HOWTO not for the experts but for people which
are looking for an easy way to setup a Linux-IrDA connection.
> correct one. The other solution is to force Dag to stop changing the
> interfaces and tools ;-)
Though it's quite difficult to follow all the moves of the
Linux-IrDA project (at least for me), I'm unsure what to do.
The Linux-IrDA developement seems to encounter sometimes unforseen
troubles with the IrDA standard. And it seems
a quite big task itself.
To gain more time for this, Dag has
announced to put most of the efforts of the Linux-IrDA
developers into 2.3/2.4 .
Probably we have to live with a more or less incomplete support
for 2.2.x, but anyway I would appreciate a schedule of
the next developement steps. And some priorities, for instance
first the CLI interfaces, next the GUIs.
If the CLIs are stable, I expect it to be more easy for
non IrDA experts to step in and help with the GUIs.
But I don't want to bother
the developers by this statement, I know all of you are
working hard for this project.
Cheers
-werner-
--
Werner Heuser | Stop nuclear power now! /~~
LiLAC - Linux with Laptop Computers | /~~~
Berlin, Germany | /~~~~
T. +49 30 349 53 86 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.snafu.de/~wehe/index_li.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www4.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
