Hello,
This question keeps popping up, is it possible to use a naming scheme for
this?
something like
xxx-irda<number> for a full patch
xxx-irda-<number><letter> for a patch patching another patch
Fons
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dag Brattli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: zondag 5 december 1999 21:55
Onderwerp: Re: [Linux-IrDA]patch-2.2.13-irda8 is out!
>Nicola Bernardini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Today, Dag Brattli mi scrisse cio` che segue:
>>
>> > Have just released patch-2.2.13-irda8 which should hopefully fix a lot
of
>> > problems. Thanks to all the contributors!!
>> [snip]
>>
>> sorry if this has been answered before. Do we need to apply all
>> patches up to irda8 to 2.2.13 in order to get the right patching
>> sequence, or can we just apply irda8?
>
>You only need -irda8. If you are unsure try patching with --dry-run. If
>that gives you errors then you probably need to apply some more patches. If
>not, it's a good indication that this patch is enough. Another thing you
>can look at is the file size. If the file size is larger than any of the
>other patches with a lower number, then you should suspect it to contain
>the other patches as well. And if it's larger than all the others and
>doesn't give any errors when using --dry-run then .... ;-)
>
>Cheers
>
>-- Dag
>
>--
> / Dag Brattli | The Linux-IrDA Project /
> // University of Tromsoe, Norway | Infrared communication for Linux //
> /// http://www.cs.uit.no/~dagb | http://www.cs.uit.no/linux-irda/ ///
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www4.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www4.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
