On Sun, Jul 30, 2006, EV wrote: > 2006-07-30: Bob Copeland dixit: > > [...] > > An aside: are there any remaining major issues before we > > release libkarma 0.0.5 on the world? > > I also think libkarma is already ripe for 0.0.5
Agreed, although there are some small things that need changing first. I will implement authenticate() and request/release_io_lock() as no-ops in karmaUsb this evening. That will finish off all the items on the TODO list. The other issue is that it should coincide with the new release of lkarmafs. If riocp is reading/writing smalldb by default then lkarmafs should do so aswell, I think. Also, this business with updating the "duration" property in lkarmafs will require some changes to the libkarma API. Both lkarmafs and libkarma will need to be in sync for that. We could either release new versions of lkarmafs and libkarma now and fix that afterwards or delay the release of both until after this is fixed. Any preferences? Keith. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
