On Tue, Aug 15, 2006, EV wrote: > Currently, taxi files have individual access permission under > control of the standard unix file permission flags. To implement > this I choosed a suitable property, "play_count_limit", which is > never used for taxis, and used it to store the flags (at least a > 16 bits integer is needed). However, this property is important > for tunes, so we have to choose another one or change the > permission management altogether. For tune files we have the > added complication of the (virtual) directories, for which > permissions can not be easyly maintained.
Why is "play_count_limit" important for tunes? What is it actually used for? If it doesn't break anything then we may as well carry on using it. Otherwise you could use one of the replay_gain flags since they are certainly unused. Those flags are only defined for the most recent firmware, though. Keith. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
