From: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Most important fixes prevent deadlocks especially under low-memory
conditions, when one is not supposed to cause more memory pressure; also
handle AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE from lower file systems.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/file.c | 6 +-
fs/unionfs/mmap.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/file.c b/fs/unionfs/file.c
index 0555b6c..b55da4f 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/file.c
@@ -101,9 +101,6 @@ static int unionfs_mmap(struct file *file, struct
vm_area_struct *vma)
unionfs_read_lock(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
- if ((err = unionfs_file_revalidate(file, 1)))
- goto out;
-
/* This might be deferred to mmap's writepage */
willwrite = ((vma->vm_flags | VM_SHARED | VM_WRITE) == vma->vm_flags);
if ((err = unionfs_file_revalidate(file, willwrite)))
@@ -132,6 +129,9 @@ static int unionfs_mmap(struct file *file, struct
vm_area_struct *vma)
out:
unionfs_read_unlock(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
+ if (!err)
+ /* copyup could cause parent dir times to change */
+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(file->f_path.dentry->d_parent->d_inode);
return err;
}
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/mmap.c b/fs/unionfs/mmap.c
index 969fd16..d26b572 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/mmap.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/mmap.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
/*
* Unionfs doesn't implement ->writepages, which is OK with the VFS and
- * nkeeps our code simpler and smaller. Nevertheless, somehow, our own
+ * keeps our code simpler and smaller. Nevertheless, somehow, our own
* ->writepage must be called so we can sync the upper pages with the lower
* pages: otherwise data changed at the upper layer won't get written to the
* lower layer.
@@ -64,10 +64,31 @@ static int unionfs_writepage(struct page *page, struct
writeback_control *wbc)
inode = page->mapping->host;
lower_inode = unionfs_lower_inode(inode);
- /* find lower page (returns a locked page) */
- lower_page = grab_cache_page(lower_inode->i_mapping, page->index);
- if (!lower_page)
+ /*
+ * find lower page (returns a locked page)
+ *
+ * NOTE: we used to call grab_cache_page(), but that was unnecessary
+ * as it would have tried to create a new lower page if it didn't
+ * exist, leading to deadlocks (esp. under memory-pressure
+ * conditions, when it is really a bad idea to *consume* more
+ * memory). Instead, we assume the lower page exists, and if we can
+ * find it, then we ->writepage on it; if we can't find it, then it
+ * couldn't have disappeared unless the kernel already flushed it,
+ * in which case we're still OK. This is especially correct if
+ * wbc->sync_mode is WB_SYNC_NONE (as per
+ * Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt). If we can't flush our page
+ * because we can't find a lower page, then at least we re-mark our
+ * page as dirty, and return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE as the VFS
+ * expects us to. (Note, if in the future it'd turn out that we
+ * have to find a lower page no matter what, then we'd have to
+ * resort to RAIF's page pointer flipping trick.)
+ */
+ lower_page = find_lock_page(lower_inode->i_mapping, page->index);
+ if (!lower_page) {
+ err = AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE;
+ set_page_dirty(page);
goto out;
+ }
/* get page address, and encode it */
kaddr = kmap(page);
@@ -85,24 +106,41 @@ static int unionfs_writepage(struct page *page, struct
writeback_control *wbc)
wbc->for_writepages = 0;
/* call lower writepage (expects locked page) */
+ clear_page_dirty_for_io(lower_page); /* emulate VFS behavior */
err = lower_inode->i_mapping->a_ops->writepage(lower_page, wbc);
wbc->for_writepages = saved_for_writepages; /* restore value */
- /*
- * update mtime and ctime of lower level file system
- * unionfs' mtime and ctime are updated by generic_file_write
- */
- lower_inode->i_mtime = lower_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
-
- page_cache_release(lower_page); /* b/c grab_cache_page increased refcnt
*/
-
+ /* b/c find_lock_page locked it and ->writepage unlocks on success */
if (err)
+ unlock_page(lower_page);
+ /* b/c grab_cache_page increased refcnt */
+ page_cache_release(lower_page);
+
+ if (err < 0) {
ClearPageUptodate(page);
- else
- SetPageUptodate(page);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (err == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) {
+ /*
+ * Lower file systems such as ramfs and tmpfs, may return
+ * AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE so that the VM won't try to
+ * (pointlessly) write the page again for a while. But
+ * those lower file systems also set the page dirty bit back
+ * again. So we mimic that behaviour here.
+ */
+ if (PageDirty(lower_page))
+ set_page_dirty(page);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* all is well */
+ SetPageUptodate(page);
+ /* lower mtimes has changed: update ours */
+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(inode);
-out:
unlock_page(page);
+
+out:
return err;
}
@@ -155,7 +193,9 @@ static int unionfs_do_readpage(struct file *file, struct
page *page)
err = 0;
/* if vfs_read succeeded above, sync up our times */
- fsstack_copy_attr_times(inode, lower_file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(inode);
+
+ flush_dcache_page(page);
out:
if (err == 0)
@@ -170,16 +210,17 @@ static int unionfs_readpage(struct file *file, struct
page *page)
{
int err;
- unionfs_read_lock(file->f_dentry->d_sb);
-
+ unionfs_read_lock(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
if ((err = unionfs_file_revalidate(file, 0)))
goto out;
err = unionfs_do_readpage(file, page);
- if (!err)
+ if (!err) {
touch_atime(unionfs_lower_mnt(file->f_path.dentry),
unionfs_lower_dentry(file->f_path.dentry));
+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
+ }
/*
* we have to unlock our page, b/c we _might_ have gotten a locked
@@ -198,11 +239,21 @@ static int unionfs_prepare_write(struct file *file,
struct page *page,
{
int err;
- unionfs_read_lock(file->f_dentry->d_sb);
-
+ unionfs_read_lock(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
+ /*
+ * This is the only place where we unconditionally copy the lower
+ * attribute times before calling unionfs_file_revalidate. The
+ * reason is that our ->write calls do_sync_write which in turn will
+ * call our ->prepare_write and then ->commit_write. Before our
+ * ->write is called, the lower mtimes are in sync, but by the time
+ * the VFS calls our ->commit_write, the lower mtimes have changed.
+ * Therefore, the only reasonable time for us to sync up from the
+ * changed lower mtimes, and avoid an invariant violation warning,
+ * is here, in ->prepare_write.
+ */
+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
err = unionfs_file_revalidate(file, 1);
-
- unionfs_read_unlock(file->f_dentry->d_sb);
+ unionfs_read_unlock(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
return err;
}
@@ -237,7 +288,8 @@ static int unionfs_commit_write(struct file *file, struct
page *page,
page_data = (char *)kmap(page);
lower_file->f_pos = (page->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) + from;
- /* SP: I use vfs_write instead of copying page data and the
+ /*
+ * SP: I use vfs_write instead of copying page data and the
* prepare_write/commit_write combo because file system's like
* GFS/OCFS2 don't like things touching those directly,
* calling the underlying write op, while a little bit slower, will
@@ -259,20 +311,15 @@ static int unionfs_commit_write(struct file *file, struct
page *page,
pos = ((loff_t) page->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) + to;
if (pos > i_size_read(inode))
i_size_write(inode, pos);
-
- /*
- * update mtime and ctime of lower level file system
- * unionfs' mtime and ctime are updated by generic_file_write
- */
- lower_inode->i_mtime = lower_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
-
+ /* if vfs_write succeeded above, sync up our times */
+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(inode);
mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
out:
if (err < 0)
ClearPageUptodate(page);
- unionfs_read_unlock(file->f_dentry->d_sb);
+ unionfs_read_unlock(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
return err; /* assume all is ok */
}
@@ -286,10 +333,19 @@ static void unionfs_sync_page(struct page *page)
inode = page->mapping->host;
lower_inode = unionfs_lower_inode(inode);
- /* find lower page (returns a locked page) */
- lower_page = grab_cache_page(lower_inode->i_mapping, page->index);
- if (!lower_page)
+ /*
+ * Find lower page (returns a locked page).
+ *
+ * NOTE: we used to call grab_cache_page(), but that was unnecessary
+ * as it would have tried to create a new lower page if it didn't
+ * exist, leading to deadlocks. All our sync_page method needs to
+ * do is ensure that pending I/O gets done.
+ */
+ lower_page = find_lock_page(lower_inode->i_mapping, page->index);
+ if (!lower_page) {
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "unionfs: find_lock_page failed\n");
goto out;
+ }
/* do the actual sync */
mapping = lower_page->mapping;
@@ -300,8 +356,10 @@ static void unionfs_sync_page(struct page *page)
if (mapping && mapping->a_ops && mapping->a_ops->sync_page)
mapping->a_ops->sync_page(lower_page);
- unlock_page(lower_page); /* b/c grab_cache_page locked it */
- page_cache_release(lower_page); /* b/c grab_cache_page increased refcnt
*/
+ /* b/c find_lock_page locked it */
+ unlock_page(lower_page);
+ /* b/c find_lock_page increased refcnt */
+ page_cache_release(lower_page);
out:
return;
--
1.5.2.2.238.g7cbf2f2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
