> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Support i.MX95
>
> On 18/07/2025 10:20, Peng Fan wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 08:48:43AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 11:52:05AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Support
> i.MX95
> >>>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>> New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for
> >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/' for 20250710-imx95-rproc-1-v4-
> 0-
> >>>> a7123e857...@nxp.com:
> >>>>
> >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa-mb-smarc-
> 2.dtb:
> >>>> scmi (arm,scmi): Unevaluated properties are not allowed
> >>>> ('protocol@80', 'protocol@81', 'protocol@82', 'protocol@84'
> were
> >>>> unexpected)
> >>>
> >>> Same as replied in v3.
> >>> This is because [1] is still not picked, not because of my patchset.
> >>
> >> I won't move on this patchset until this is resolved.
> >>
> >
> > Not understand why hold on this patchset. I suppose you may not
> > understand what the error means. The warning is totally irrelevant to
> > this patchset, there is no dependency.
> >
> > Others added a property to
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa.dtsi
> > &scmi_bbm {
> > linux,code = <KEY_POWER>;
> > };
> > But this "linux,code" property not landed(missed to be picked up) to
> DT binding.
> >
> > This patchset does not touch scmi_bbm. I could help address the
> > warning in the other patch, but I do not see why "linux,code" under
> > scmi_bbm node could block this patchset.
>
>
> Lack of proper binding for that property might hide other issues with
> this patchset, because schema is not evaluated. Make your DTS and
> bindings correct, then start growing the device nodes.
Not NXP board, I could help fix, but that should not block this patchset.
There is no hidden issue. I removed "linux,code" from the tqma9596sa
board dts, and no warning with CHECK_DTBS.
More info:
This patchset does nothing with scmi_bbm nodes and bindings.
The warning triggered by the board which is not NXP
board(arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa.dtsi).
This patchset does not touch that board dts.
What this patchset added is scmi_cpu and scmi_lmm nodes in
imx95.dtsi. The binding check already pass when I worked
on the scmi lmm/cpu protocol patchset.
Back to DTB check, by removing
linux,code = <KEY_BACK> from
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa.dtsi,
there is no warning.
Regards,
Peng.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
