> On 8/1/25 04:25, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > In order to introduce the counting of active sgx users on top
> > of clean functions that allocate vepc structures, covert existing
> > sgx_(vepc_)open to __sgx_(vepc_)open. Later patch will introduce the
> > top level wrappers that manage the usage count.
> >
> > No functional change intended in this patch.
> 
> I'm not following at all why this patch is needed. It looks like pure
> unneeded churn to me.

I am happy to merge this into patch 2 if there are no objections. 
Jarkko originally wanted these two patches separated for clarity, so
I followed his suggestion. 

Best Regards,
Elena.

Reply via email to