> On 8/1/25 04:25, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > In order to introduce the counting of active sgx users on top > > of clean functions that allocate vepc structures, covert existing > > sgx_(vepc_)open to __sgx_(vepc_)open. Later patch will introduce the > > top level wrappers that manage the usage count. > > > > No functional change intended in this patch. > > I'm not following at all why this patch is needed. It looks like pure > unneeded churn to me.
I am happy to merge this into patch 2 if there are no objections. Jarkko originally wanted these two patches separated for clarity, so I followed his suggestion. Best Regards, Elena.