Hi Luca, > I'm also not sure what these parameters depend on, if it's CCI HW version, > or > something else. So naming it after the SoC should be a safer bet. Also the > msm8974-cci was only named 'v1.5' because it's an inbetween mix of the v1 > and > v2 that were already upstream so arguably that one shouldn't have been > called > v1.5 in the first place either. > > Let me know what you think. Maybe also someone from Qualcomm/Linaro can jump > in and share their thoughts, if someone knows more what these params depend > on.
Thanks for the heads up. I agree that it needs someone from Qualcomm for definite answers. But if nobody chimes in, your patch is good as is from my side. Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com> Thanks, Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
