From: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731...@gmail.com>
The comment was correct, but `checkpatch` script flagged it with a warning
as shown in the output section. The comment is slightly modified
to improve readability, which also suppresses the warning.
```
[command]
./script/checkpatch.pl --strict -f
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
[output]
WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'on'
```
Fixes: 98102a2cb7860 : kselftest/arm64: Hold fp-stress children until they're
all spawned.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731...@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
index 74e23208b94c..3a0ae96cf909 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-stress.c
@@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ static void child_start(struct child_data *child, const
char *program)
/*
* Read from the startup pipe, there should be no data
- * and we should block until it is closed. We just
- * carry on on error since this isn't super critical.
+ * and we should block until it is closed. We just
+ * carry-on on error since this isn't super critical.
*/
ret = read(3, &i, sizeof(i));
if (ret < 0)
--
2.25.1
