On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 01:57:05AM +0300, Nikola Z. Ivanov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Do you have a reference there, note that these are just plain non-static > > variables? I wouldn't trust checkpatch for anything that isn't kernel > > code (and even there it's got issues). > This is what it says in the C99/C11/C18/C23 drafts I found: ... > Since as you said checkpatch.pl is mostly intended for kernel code > (which I was not aware of) this patch is probably not desired. > In case it still is I can add quote to the draft and link it in the patch. No, it's fine - thanks for checking the reference. I suspected this might be something specific to how the kernel is linked: Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
