[PATCH] PMCR_EL0.N is RAZ/WI. At least a build failes in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. Remove the set function.

[Itaru Kitayama]

Signed-off-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitay...@fujitsu.com>
---
Seen a build failure with old Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, while the latest release
has no build issue, a write to the bit fields is RAZ/WI, remove the
function.
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
index 
f16b3b27e32ed7ca57481f27d689d47783aa0345..56214a4430be90b3e1d840f2719b22dd44f0b49b
 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
@@ -45,11 +45,6 @@ static uint64_t get_pmcr_n(uint64_t pmcr)
        return FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N, pmcr);
 }
 
-static void set_pmcr_n(uint64_t *pmcr, uint64_t pmcr_n)
-{
-       u64p_replace_bits((__u64 *) pmcr, pmcr_n, ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N);
-}
-
 static uint64_t get_counters_mask(uint64_t n)
 {
        uint64_t mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
@@ -490,7 +485,6 @@ static void test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(uint64_t 
pmcr_n, bool expect_fail)
         * Setting a larger value of PMCR.N should not modify the field, and
         * return a success.
         */
-       set_pmcr_n(&pmcr, pmcr_n);
        vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr);
        pmcr = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0));
 

---
base-commit: aae5a9834b388860844b294c70c8770dd26e528c
change-id: 20250912-selftest-fix3-27f285e79d82

Best regards,
-- 
Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitay...@linux.dev>