On 09/09/25 7:32 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:52:05 +0530 Dev Jain <dev.j...@arm.com> wrote:
On 26/08/25 12:37 pm, Dev Jain wrote:
This patchset ensures that the number of hugepages is correctly set in the
system so that the uffd-stress test does not fail due to the racy nature of
the test. Patch 1 corrects the hugepage constraint in the run_vmtests.sh
script, whereas patch 2 corrects the constraint in the test itself.
Dev Jain (2):
selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Make test operate on less hugetlb memory
selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Stricten constraint on free hugepages before
the test
tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Hi Andrew,
I wanted to make a v2 of this series to replace 10 with min(32, nrcpus - 1)
That sounds line a one-line change? Send a one-line change ;)
(see computation of nr_parallel in uffd-stress.c) but I see that it has
been pulled into mm-new, and on top of that, the following patch makes
things complicated to just revert my commits in mm-new and make v2 on top of
that -
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250830033424.8c44fc4c...@smtp.kernel.org/
So shall I just send a new separate patch based off mm-new?
Or just resend the whole series based on mainline or something?
I'll do this, since the change will be more than a line. Thanks.
