Fix various coding style issues across the audit subsystem flagged
by checkpatch.pl script to adhere to kernel coding standards.

Specific changes include:
- kernel/auditfilter.c: Move the open brace '{' to the previous line
  for the audit_ops array declaration.
- lib/audit.c: Add a required space before the open parenthesis '('.
- include/uapi/linux/audit.h: Enclose the complex macro value for
  AUDIT_UID_UNSET in parentheses.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Robaina <[email protected]>
---
 include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 +-
 kernel/auditfilter.c       | 3 +--
 lib/audit.c                | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
index 14a1c1fe013a..de4015430476 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ struct audit_tty_status {
        __u32           log_passwd;     /* 1 = enabled, 0 = disabled */
 };
 
-#define AUDIT_UID_UNSET (unsigned int)-1
+#define AUDIT_UID_UNSET ((unsigned int)-1)
 #define AUDIT_SID_UNSET ((unsigned int)-1)
 
 /* audit_rule_data supports filter rules with both integer and string
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index 6e3abbf08e3d..093425123f6c 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -303,8 +303,7 @@ static inline struct audit_entry 
*audit_to_entry_common(struct audit_rule_data *
        return ERR_PTR(err);
 }
 
-static u32 audit_ops[] =
-{
+static u32 audit_ops[] = {
        [Audit_equal] = AUDIT_EQUAL,
        [Audit_not_equal] = AUDIT_NOT_EQUAL,
        [Audit_bitmask] = AUDIT_BIT_MASK,
diff --git a/lib/audit.c b/lib/audit.c
index 738bda22dd39..bc07fbd3a698 100644
--- a/lib/audit.c
+++ b/lib/audit.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int audit_classify_syscall(int abi, unsigned syscall)
        if (audit_is_compat(abi))
                return audit_classify_compat_syscall(abi, syscall);
 
-       switch(syscall) {
+       switch (syscall) {
 #ifdef __NR_open
        case __NR_open:
                return AUDITSC_OPEN;
-- 
2.53.0


Reply via email to