On Sat, Jul 04, 2026 at 11:10:18AM +0200, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: > > > Le 08/06/2026 à 11:54, [email protected] a écrit : > > From: David Laight <[email protected]> > > > > Replacing strcpy() with strscpy() ensures than overflow of the target > > buffer cannot happen. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Laight <[email protected]> > > --- > > This is one of a group of patches that remove potentially unbounded > > strcpy() calls. > > > > They are mostly replaced by strscpy() or, when strlen() has just been > > called, with memcpy() (usually including the '\0'). > > > > Calls with copy string literals into arrays are left unchanged. > > They are safe and easily detected as such. > > > > The changes were made by getting the compiler to detect the calls and > > then fixing the code by hand. > > > > Note that all the changes are only compile tested. > > > > Some Makefiles were changed to allow files to contain strcpy(). > > As well as 'difficult to fix' files, this included 'show' functions > > as they really need to use sysfs_emit() or seq_printf(). > > > > All the patches are being sent individually to avoid very long cc lists. > > Apologies for the terse commit messages and likely unexpected tags. > > (There are about 100 patches in total.) > > > > drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Do you expect this patch to go via individual trees or will you apply them > all together in a given tree ? > > Ioana, as usual I can take it via soc/fsl/ with your Ack.
Yes, you can take the patch through soc/fsl. Reviewed-by: Ioana Ciornei <[email protected]>
