On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 4:54 PM Leon Hwang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Introduce a new sysctl knob, net.ipv4.tcp_purge_receive_queue, to
> address an unreleased SKBs issue related to TCP sockets.
>
> Issue:
> When a TCP socket in the CLOSE_WAIT state receives a RST packet, the
> current implementation does not clear the socket's receive queue. This
> causes SKBs in the queue to remain allocated until the socket is
> explicitly closed by the application. As a consequence:
>
> 1. The page pool pages held by these SKBs are not released.
> 2. The associated page pool cannot be freed.
>
> RFC 9293 Section 3.10.7.4 specifies that when a RST is received in
> CLOSE_WAIT state, "all segment queues should be flushed." However, the
> current implementation does not flush the receive queue.
>
> Solution:
> Add a per-namespace sysctl (net.ipv4.tcp_purge_receive_queue) that,
> when enabled, causes the kernel to purge the receive queue when a RST
> packet is received in CLOSE_WAIT state. This allows immediate release
> of SKBs and their associated memory resources.
>
> The feature is disabled by default to maintain backward compatibility
> with existing behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst        | 18 +++++++++++++++
>  .../net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst      |  1 +
>  include/net/netns/ipv4.h                      |  1 +
>  net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c                    |  9 ++++++++
>  net/ipv4/tcp_input.c                          | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst 
> b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> index 208f46967ee5..abbee0326f15 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
> @@ -1448,6 +1448,24 @@ tcp_rto_max_ms - INTEGER
>
>         Default: 120,000
>
> +tcp_purge_receive_queue - BOOLEAN
> +       When a socket in the TCP_CLOSE_WAIT state receives a RST packet, the
> +       default behavior is to not clear its receive queue.  As a result,
> +       any SKBs in the queue are not freed until the socket is closed.
> +       Consequently, the pages held by these SKBs are not released, which
> +       can also prevent the associated page pool from being freed.
> +
> +       If enabled, the receive queue is purged upon receiving the RST,
> +       allowing the SKBs and their associated memory to be released
> +       promptly.
> +
> +       Possible values:
> +
> +       - 0 (disabled)
> +       - 1 (enabled)
> +
> +       Default: 0 (disabled)
> +
>  UDP variables
>  =============
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst 
> b/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst
> index 3dc03bff739e..2945de40ad78 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ unsigned_long                   
> sysctl_tcp_comp_sack_delay_ns
>  unsigned_long                   sysctl_tcp_comp_sack_slack_ns                
>                                         __tcp_ack_snd_check
>  int                             sysctl_max_syn_backlog
>  int                             sysctl_tcp_fastopen
> +u8                              sysctl_tcp_purge_receive_queue
>  struct_tcp_congestion_ops       tcp_congestion_control                       
>                                         init_cc
>  struct_tcp_fastopen_context     tcp_fastopen_ctx
>  unsigned_int                    sysctl_tcp_fastopen_blackhole_timeout
> diff --git a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
> index cb7f8bf15671..ab9b92807d9f 100644
> --- a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
> +++ b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
> @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ struct netns_ipv4 {
>         u8 sysctl_tcp_nometrics_save;
>         u8 sysctl_tcp_no_ssthresh_metrics_save;
>         u8 sysctl_tcp_workaround_signed_windows;
> +       u8 sysctl_tcp_purge_receive_queue;
>         int sysctl_tcp_challenge_ack_limit;
>         u8 sysctl_tcp_min_tso_segs;
>         u8 sysctl_tcp_reflect_tos;
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> index ca1180dba1de..82412fd98e0e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> @@ -1652,6 +1652,15 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = {
>                 .extra1         = SYSCTL_ONE_THOUSAND,
>                 .extra2         = &tcp_rto_max_max,
>         },
> +       {
> +               .procname       = "tcp_purge_receive_queue",
> +               .data           = 
> &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_purge_receive_queue,
> +               .maxlen         = sizeof(u8),
> +               .mode           = 0644,
> +               .proc_handler   = proc_dou8vec_minmax,
> +               .extra1         = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> +               .extra2         = SYSCTL_ONE,
> +       },
>  };
>
>  static __net_init int ipv4_sysctl_init_net(struct net *net)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 61045a8886e4..4f1027173e95 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -4853,6 +4853,7 @@ void tcp_done_with_error(struct sock *sk, int err)
>  /* When we get a reset we do this. */
>  void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> +       const struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
>         int err;
>
>         trace_tcp_receive_reset(sk);
> @@ -4869,6 +4870,27 @@ void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>                 err = ECONNREFUSED;
>                 break;
>         case TCP_CLOSE_WAIT:
> +               /* RFC9293 3.10.7.4. Other States
> +                *   Second, check the RST bit:
> +                *     CLOSE-WAIT STATE
> +                *
> +                * If the RST bit is set, then any outstanding RECEIVEs and
> +                * SEND should receive "reset" responses.  All segment queues
> +                * should be flushed.  Users should also receive an 
> unsolicited
> +                * general "connection reset" signal.  Enter the CLOSED state,
> +                * delete the TCB, and return.
> +                *
> +                * If net.ipv4.tcp_purge_receive_queue is enabled,
> +                * sk_receive_queue will be flushed too.
> +                */
> +               if 
> (unlikely(READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_purge_receive_queue))) {
> +                       struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> +
> +                       skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> +                       WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, tp->rcv_nxt);
> +                       WRITE_ONCE(tp->urg_data, 0);
> +                       sk_set_peek_off(sk, -1);
> +               }
>                 err = EPIPE;
>                 break;
>         case TCP_CLOSE:
> --
> 2.55.0
>

My thoughts are:

out_of_order_queue has been forgotten. skbs could be there and still
'block devmem'

WRITE_ONCE(tp->copied_seq, tp->rcv_nxt) is certainly wrong, because
read() will return 0, instead of -1 (errno = EPIPE or ECONNRESET)
So the application will not know a RST was received :/

I think that BSD and linux implementations have historically retained
acknowledged,
buffered receive data upon RST to allow applications to drain data
already ACKed prior to the reset.

Adding a narrow sysctl specifically for CLOSE_WAIT creates
inconsistent behavior across TCP states.

Thanks.

Reply via email to