> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/Makefile b/arch/riscv/net/Makefile
> index 9a1e5f0a94e5..6458d4d51990 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/Makefile
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 2f1109dbf105..ca9d0e811aea 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -1834,7 +1834,13 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn,
> struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
> + /*
> + * arch_bpf_timed_may_goto() is emitted by the verifier and
> + * returns its result in BPF_REG_AX instead of BPF_REG_0, so
> + * skip the normal "move return register into R0".
> + */
> + if (insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL &&
> + addr != (u64)arch_bpf_timed_may_goto)
^^^^
This isn't a bug, but could this fit on one line? The 100-character line
limit would allow the full condition without the break.
[ ... ]
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/29858413299
