Em Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Andi Kleen escreveu: > > I found just it to be another reason for cleaning up the includes hell, > > but I agree completely that the correct solution is for gcc to do the > > right thing and eliminate unused debug types. > > Yes, but I'm a little disappointed that it doesn't work either. > I remember long ago trying an original patch which did something > similar to -feliminate-dwarf2-* on a 3.3-hammer based gcc and > it actually shrunk the objdir size considerably.
>From my limited set of tests I expect it to shrunk the objdir by a lot :-) - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
