>Now, you could probably argue that instead of inline asms we should have
>more flexibility in doing a per-callee calling convention. That would be
>good too, no question about it.
>
> Linus
>
Today's flamebait has been postponed. Happy July 4th. Peace.
Rick Hohensee
www.clienux.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("") Rick Hohensee
- Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("&quo... Michael Meissner
- Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("&quo... Cort Dougan
- Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm(&q... Cort Dougan
- Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("&quo... Rick Hohensee
- Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("&quo... Rick Hohensee

