On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:00:51 -0500
Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:41:19 +0100, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > notify_lock isn't a good name for a global lock.
> > But since it's not used outside of the file, it can be made static.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm2-full/drivers/connector/connector.c.old 2005-01-31
> > 13:09:14.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm2-full/drivers/connector/connector.c 2005-01-31
> > 13:09:28.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
> > module_param(cn_idx, uint, 0);
> > module_param(cn_val, uint, 0);
> >
> > -spinlock_t notify_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> > +static spinlock_t notify_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> > static LIST_HEAD(notify_list);
> >
> > static struct cn_dev cdev;
> >
>
> Isn't this supposed to be "static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(notify_lock);" nowadays?
That's not a problem, I will cook up a patch and send it through Greg.
Thank you.
> --
> Dmitry
Evgeniy Polyakov
Only failure makes us experts. -- Theo de Raadt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
