Hi. On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 11:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > I guess I'm wrong then - I thought the other changes avoided compilation > > > > errors. > > > > > > Well, yes, if you switch pm_message_t into struct. But we are not yet > > > ready to do that... it is going to be typedefed to u32 for 2.6.11... > > > > Ah. So I haven't realised that Bernard took your patches wholesale, > > which is why we're fixing the compile errors too :> > > > > Okay then, I guess the whole thing isn't urgent then? > > Well, it would be nice to be able to switch to struct pm_message_t > very soon in 2.6.12 cycle, so that it actually works in 2.6.12...
Okay.. but it can wait until post 2.6.11, right? Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia http://www.cyclades.com Ph: +61 (2) 6292 8028 Mob: +61 (417) 100 574 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
