On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 14:32, Robin Getz wrote:
> On Mon 12 Jan 2009 13:58, Mike Frysinger pondered:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 13:39,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > --- trunk/arch/blackfin/include/asm/pda.h   2009-01-12 18:37:22 UTC (rev 
>> > 5998)
>> > +++ trunk/arch/blackfin/include/asm/pda.h   2009-01-12 18:39:25 UTC (rev 
>> > 5999)
>> > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
>> >     unsigned long icplb_fault_addr;
>> >     unsigned long retx;
>> >     unsigned long seqstat;
>> > +   unsigned int __nmi_count;       /* number of NMI on this CPUs */
>> >  };
>>
>> dont think this needs __ prefix ... it's already in the cpu_pda
>> struct, so there really isnt namespace pollution to avoid
>>
>> also, the comment indicates that this is like the number of available
>> NMIs on the proc rather than the NMI *event* count
>
> I just used what was in arch/x86/include/asm/pda.h
>
>    unsigned int __nmi_count;       /* number of NMI on this CPUs */
>
> Doesn't mean it is correct (I'll change it if you poke me again) - but that 
> is where I grabbed it from.

i guess __ can stay, but really the comment should be cleaned up (both
in terms of clarity and grammar)
-mike
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-commits

Reply via email to