On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 16:11, Robin Getz wrote: > That should make most of the nastiness go away there - and, and the same > time - clean up bug 3417 > > http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/tracker/3417
btw, is the last comment in that bug still valid ? i.e. does isram_memcpy() only operate on 64bit chunks ? i thought you fixed it to be like a real memcpy() so it operates down to the individual byte level ... -mike _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-commits mailing list [email protected] https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-commits
