>-----Original Message-----
>From: Zhang, Sonic [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:57 PM
>To: Mike Frysinger; [email protected]
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Linux-kernel-commits] [7352]
>trunk/arch/blackfin: PJx can onlybe peripheral pins, so mark
>them DONTCARE
>
>Don't worry about this walk around. It is just used to avoid kernel
>crash. Michael will check in a final fix after he returns.
>
>
>Sonic
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>Mike Frysinger
>Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:41 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-commits] [7352] trunk/arch/blackfin: PJx can
>onlybe peripheral pins, so mark them DONTCARE
>
>On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 00:36, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Revision 7352 Author bhsong Date 2009-09-16 00:36:29 -0400 (Wed, 16
>> Sep
>> 2009)
>>
>> Log Message
>>
>> PJx can only be peripheral pins, so mark them DONTCARE move gpio
>> number check behind DONTCARE check
>
>i dont think this is what we want. you've changed it so that multiple
>drivers can request the same peripheral pin and conflicts wont be
>detected ...
Right. I lost the MAX_RESOURCES macro, which is bigger than
MAX_BLACKFIN_GPIOS defined in BF537. So pins between 48 and 63 can be
reserverd by peripheral, but not by gpio.
It seems that macro should be renamed to namespaced
MAX_BLACKFIN_RESOURCES.
>-mike
>_______________________________________________
>Linux-kernel-commits mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-commits
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-commits
