On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:11, real mz wrote: > I tested on bf537-stamp board and found the slave address of ad5252 > in extend board was 0x2e. The ad5252 has two bits for slave address > decode, > customers can define the slave address (from 0x2c ... 0x2f) and then > the I2C_BOARD_INFO for ad5252.
yes, but the point is, why do our examples have different addresses ? if the demo board is using 0x2e, shouldnt all of our boards be defaulting to that ? -mike _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-commits mailing list [email protected] https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-commits
