Alan Cox wrote: > > > However, in 2.5.0 we should apply it, and force it on *all* cpus just > > to test it well. Then in 2.5.10 we should turn it off for > > pentium/MMX+. > > Even original pentium has hardware optimised rep movs fast paths. Its just > a few cpus they disable it via undocumented magic (ditto it seems a couple > of PII chip steppings judging by msr usage traces of bioses coming up in > bochs) Alan, can you send me again the list of CPUs you think is worth using 486 string routines. Sorry, i lost your previous mail. best, Petkan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Alan Cox
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Pavel Machek
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Alan Cox
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Alan Cox
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov