In article <8p5u21$r0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > However, what I think Al Viro dislikes about this is that it does tend > to leave code that won't compile, just because some of the accesses are > in places that the compiler doesn't see due to the pre-processor (or due > to other build-rules: like in architectures that aren't the one that the > developer uses). That's why there are people that try to built all possible combinations of .config options. Granted, that doesn't happen for non-i386 yet, but that is just a matter of available hardware :) Greetings, Arjan van de Ven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... Jonathan Walther
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... David Woodhouse
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Nix
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... Linus Torvalds
- if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Martin MaD Douda
- Re: if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Alexander Viro
- Re: if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Russell King
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integr... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Peter Rival