On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
>> Have you bothered tell us what that error is? I've not seen anything on
>> dpt's mail-list. (Which is where this should be discussed.)
>
>I've emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that's what the linuxi2oreadme.txt says to
>do for help) MANY times pleading for help. i asked for Phone#'s, web
>pages, ftp sites, and yes email lists. I've yet to get a reply in 6 months
>of asking.
Gez, Adaptec has made a fscking mess out of this -- I knew those *sses would.
>> Yes they do. You just are talking to the right people. (Maybe those "right
>> people" aren't there anymore. DPT is now an Adaptec company, remember.)
>
>If I can call and email for 6 months and never get a reply that means they
>DON'T care in my book.
([EMAIL PROTECTED] is the mail list, btw)
The people I talked to in April:
"Salyzyn, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Tran, Huy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At the time, they had someone "starting on monday" to handle the linux
driver. I guess they never made it to work that Monday :-)
>> I'm the one who made it work at 2.3.33... I sent those changes to DPT and
>> mailed several lists.
>>
>> (http://chickenboo.bluetopia.net/~jfbeam/DPT/)
>
>Great! What about 2.2.17? ot 2.4.0(test) ? I really don't care much
>about 2.3.33.
I don't run 2.2. And I showed you the driver (that very 2.3.33 driver)
running on 2.4.0-test... I've put a README in there to deal with alot
of these questions (and I knew you where gonna bitch about it being 2.3.33)
Why are people always to inflexable as to require everything to match up
atom to atom (bit for bit) before they will try anything? Did you look
at the patches at all? They hardly touch the kernel sources at all. The
changes necessary are to the dpt_i2o driver itself.
As I've stated in the README, I do not have explicit permission to distribute
their driver.
>Vendor: DPT Model: PM2554U2 Rev: 211D, scsi 1:
First, get the latest firmware (I have no clue where adaptec might have
hidden them.)
>Q: When attempting to compile my kernel, I am getting lots
>of error such as:
> drivers/scsi/scsi.a(dpt_i2o.o): In function `dpt_add_timer':
> dpt_i2o.o(.text+0x10): undefined reference to
> `del_timer_Rsmp_5811f067'
>A: This is an error seen when using a compiler newer than gcc 2.7.2. Use
> gcc 2.7.2 or older.
Right. This is caused by the compiler... *cough*bullshit*cough*. Either
del_timer isn't exported or the dpt driver didn't load the right include
file. I'll go play with 2.2.17 later. (Some companies have a negative
clue level.)
>Another wierd thing is even though they have a "patch" for this card they
>give instructions to manually edit it a .h file they forgot to include.
See above about "clue".
--Ricky
PS: Ignore the mis-information from Adaptec/DPT. If you're as smart as you
should be, you can fix this yourself (assuming you know much about the
linux kernel and how it gets built.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
