On Mon, Sep 18 2000, Eric Youngdale wrote: > What is the primary objective here - getting rid of #ifdef MODULE, or is > it removing redundant code for the two paths? Or both? > > I am just trying to get a handle on what is driving this. Well the code clean-up came as a pleasent side effect of removing ifdef MODULE. But now it seems Linus has done it without this. I think this is okay, as it gives us a _nice_ working scsi layer back, on which we can build our cleanup. -- Torben Mathiasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux ThunderLAN maintainer http://tlan.kernel.dk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: SCSI scanning Jan Niehusmann
- Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Eric Youngdale
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Eric Youngdale
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Mr. James W. Laferriere
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Sven Koch
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning David S. Miller