Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I've looked Singe UNIX Specification, Version 2 and there this seems
> > perfectly acceptable.
> >
> > I'd like very much to have some feedback to do the RightThing (tm).
> >
> > The alternative of course would be to add a result field inside struct
> > passed by pointer to ioctl call.
>
> Linux doesnt care. If you want ALSA to run on SYS5 or BSD derived kernels you
> should avoid returning anything but 0/error-code from ioctls.
>
I'd like you clarify the reasons for this choice in these OS families.
Probably one of your gnomes knows it (I hope that this specific gnome is
not in hibernation in this season :-)
--
Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opera Unica
Via Emilia Interna, 140 Phone: +39.0546.656023
48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy Fax: +39.0546.656023
ALSA project is http://www.alsa-project.org
sponsored by SuSE Linux http://www.suse.com
It sounds good!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
