On Mon, Sep 25 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > The scsi layer currently "manually" does a list_add on the queue itself, > > which doesn't look too healthy. > > It's grabbing the io_request_lock so it looks healthy for now :) It's safe alright, but if we want to do the generic_unplug_queue instead of just hitting the request_fn (which might do anything anyway), it would be nicer to expose this part of the block layer (i.e. have a general way of queueing a request to the request_queue). But I guess just q->plug_device_fn(q, ...); list_add(...) generic_unplug_device(q); would suffice in scsi_lib for now. -- * Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar