Michael Meding wrote: > > Hi there, > > you have of course used kgcc for the compile job ? 2.96 maybe is chewing > the kernel source a little bit too well. I dunno about all this... The stock gcc 2.96 works great for everything on my box... It compiles and runs 2.4.0-test7 really well. I'm not sure what your problem is... I did an FTP install, if that makes _any_ difference in what was installed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: What is up with Redha... Guest section DW
- Re: What is up with Redha... Chip Salzenberg
- Re: What is up with Redha... Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redha... tytso
- Re: What is up with Redh... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.... Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? David Riley
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Chris McClellen
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alec Smith
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Stephen E. Clark
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Kris Karas
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Daniel Stone
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox