On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> In order for hdparm -d 1 to work in test9-pre8, I had to reverse
> this change. (Without being able to enable dma, performance here
> is muy el-stinko;-) Is enabling dma manually now forbidden? (or
> am I maybe missing something else?)
If this change broke your DMA enabling, I think there are other bugs
lurking in the code...
Can you provide a "diff -u " of dmesg, output, with, and without the
change below?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
