Matthew Hawkins wrote: > > Perhaps you're getting Redhat confused with Debian here. Redhat doesn't > have package maintainers. It has 1,000 monkeys at 1,000 typewriters > recreating the works of Shakespeare, a la "it was the best of times, it > was the blurst of times" Er... Just a side note, and completely off-topic, but that's Dickens, not Shakespeare. Just thought I'd put my thought in... :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Kris Karas
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Daniel Stone
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? J. Dow
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Chris Kloiber
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Chris Faylor
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Matthew Hawkins
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Dmitri Pogosyan
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? David Riley
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Kai Henningsen
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Matthew Hawkins