On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Andreas Dilger wrote:

> Al Viro writes:
> >     Folks, give it a try - just keep decent backups. Similar code will
> > have to go into UFS in 2.4 and that (ext2) variant may be of interest for
> > 2.4.<late>/2.5.<early> timeframe.
> 
> Haven't tested it yet, but just reading over the patch - in ext2_lookup():
> 
>         if (dentry->d_name.len > UFS_MAXNAMLEN)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG)
> 
> should probably be changed back to:
> 
>         if (dentry->d_name.len > EXT2_NAME_LEN)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG)

Grrr... It shows the ancestry - it's a ported UFS patch. Thanks for spotting,
I'll fix that.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to