On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 11:12:24PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No, better yet,
> what is a good version to use when porting to a new processor (actually
> an old processor)? I've pulled the source to gcc (2.95.2) and binutils
> (2.10) in prep for a port to a new/old machine. If these versions aren't
> good to start from, what versions are and where can I find them?
Those versions surely are not good to start from for doing new ports.
There is almost 2 years of development gone since 2.95 was frozen and many
things have changed, so if you start with 2.95.2, you'll have a hard time
forward porting it to gcc 3.
With binutils it probably does not matter much, but it could be easier to
use CVS as well.
Jakub
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? John Anthony Kazos Jr.
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Larry McVoy
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Alexander Viro
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Jamie Lokier
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Kim Shepherd
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Jamie Lokier
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? doctor
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Michael Meding
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Stefan Traby
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Igmar Palsenberg

