-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is this a problem where the code produced by 2.95 was non-optimal in some significant way or simply incorrect, or is it really just a subjective "takes to long to compile XXX" thing? Andrew Purtell NAI Labs at Network Associates, Inc. Los Angeles, CA PGP Keys: ldap://certserver.pgp.com PGP Fingerprint: 5A21 10DB 92B0 CE20 80B4 90D7 A89C D464 AA0A A616 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.1 Comment: Crypto Provided by Network Associates <http://www.nai.com> iQA/AwUBOd4bNaic1GSqCqYWEQJGHQCeNwodLtadXU+kwIXW0Q+6zQMl3c4AoLs6 3KKAuVzXn757Bsp5RrdGZsAT =1uvj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
