Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

[Rik van Riel]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Aaron Sethman wrote:

> I think the run time should probably be accounted into to this
> as well. Basically start knocking off recent processes first,
> which are likely to be childless, and start working your way up
> in age.

I'm almost getting USENET flashbacks ...  ;)

Please look at the code before suggesting something that
is already there (and has been in the code for some 2 years).

regards,

Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
       -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

http://www.conectiva.com/               http://www.surriel.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/