> > Still, it would be nice to recover that 4 MB when the system > > doesn't have any memory left. > Yup. The X server could give back the memory for some cases like the > background without too much hackery. Then Linux only needs to implement SIGDANGER, which has been talked about for years... X would be a good candidate to implement a handler for it. Others are Emacs, Mozilla or JVMs - basically everything which has a GC of some sort. It could even be used to implement a configurable user mode OOM killer. Olaf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Marco Colombo
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jim Gettys
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jim Gettys
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jim Gettys
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Olaf Titz
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Miles Lane
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rogier Wolff
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler bert hubert
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jim Gettys
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Gerrit . Huizenga